Some may ask, “What is the value of this project?” Why do some people bother to call for its preservation and the prevention of its demolition? Some activists, such as Arch. Dema Ak Ghunaim, Arch. Dalal Al Hashash, Dr. Aseel Al Ragam, Dr. Mohamad AL Jassar, Dr. Hassan Ashkanani and others, led the efforts to overturn the government’s decision. In this article, I will try to enumerate a few points that may play a part in convincing the decision makers and the public opinion to preserve the project and rehabilitate it:

1- Some may see the project as an ugly, unworthy structure. However, the concept of beauty and utility changes over time. What we see as ugly today may be seen as beautiful in the eyes of the future generation. Moreover, what we see as useless the future generation may find ways to utilize it wisely.

2- Al Sawaber represents the spirit of a prominent period of the country and carries part of the history of Kuwait. It is a civil and cultural landmark that carries the marks of the eighties period, which is characterized as the development and growth period.

3- Regardless of the quality of the design and our opinions about the success or failure of the project, the project used to house a large number of families. Many people spent an important period of their lives within its boundaries. As such, this compound carries memories and meanings. The value of spaces derives from the events that occurred in them. Cities in general make up their values from the sum of these memory-charged spaces.

4-We need to note that the project has an architectural value; it is a landmark that was designed by a world-renowned Canadian Architect Arthur Erikson. Despite our variable opinions about the success of the design, it is considered an architectural experiment that sought to react to the local environment of Kuwait and its special social requirements. Thus, it is crucial that this project be saved to allow the specialists to evaluate in the future.

5-Such mega projects expend huge human efforts. As the process of planning, designing, constructing and handing over must have taken prolonged periods, deciding to demolish the project will waste all those valuable times that went into the realization of the project.

6-The world today and more than ever is keen on protecting historic buildings and rehabilitating them rather than demolishing and rebuilding. As such practices play a role in the protection of the environment and saving the waste of resources and materials, advanced nations protect the environment and take decisions that reflect their integrity in honoring their commitment to the environment.

7-Before we demolish Al Sawaber, we should review the economic and financial impact of such an act. We should study whether the rehabilitation of the project could be feasible and more attractive. As far as the investors are concerned, this is the most important factor. Why don’t we evaluate alternatives and test them financially, and invite investors and real estate developers to compete on proposing alternative models in order to take our decisions based on accurate information?

8- From an urban point of view, the project has a potential to become an additional value to Kuwait City. It can become a mixed-use development model that houses living, working and entertainment spaces. It can provide alternative venues for the small business and the creative classes who seek an alternative lifestyle. Kuwait City lacks diversity and is filled with the repetition of the same banal commercial model that adds very little to the overall built environment of Kuwait City.

In conclusion, it is dangerous to swiftly take such crucial decisions. Let us be aware of the over confidence that what we are proposing will be better than what currently exists. Let us study the project thoroughly. We have qualified professionals and smart developers who are able to create opportunities, which we can currently benefit from and for the future generations as well.