أرشيف الوسم: city

From Consumer to Constructor: Jameel Akbar’s View of Productive Cities

مصنف فى :مقالات
  • زيارات : 640 | تعليقات : 0
  • بتاريخ : 13 يناير 2026
From Consumer to Constructor: Jameel Akbar’s View of Productive Cities

“Utopia is on the horizon. When I draw nearer by two steps, it retreats two steps. If I proceed ten steps forward, it swiftly slips ten steps ahead. No matter how far I go, I can never reach it. What, then, is the purpose of utopia? It is to cause us to advance.”

              – Eduardo Galeano

—————————————————————————————————————————

Sometimes, turning to radical ideas can be helpful. These ideas challenge what is familiar, encourage new ways of thinking, and offer solutions we might not have considered. Even if they seem impractical, bold ideas can still make a positive difference.

To complete the topic of productive cities, I thought it necessary to present the ideas of the urban thinker Dr. Jamil Akbar, who has made significant contributions to urbanism and seeks to offer a new vision derived from Islamic culture that challenges the prevailing situation. It deals beyond the urban form to the methods of politics and the general administration of the state and the people. Dr. Jamil Abdulqader Akbar is one of those who put forward big ideas, and he works honestly and diligently to spread and defend them. He was a professor of architecture and planning at King Faisal University and the author of the book “Architecture of the Earth in Islam” and the great book “Cutting the Truth”.

Dr. Jameel Akbar sees productivity and work as more than just employment and earning a salary. He connects them closely to property, freedom, and urban development. In his view, work is the only valid way to gain rights, and it is the main force behind the urban energy that is missing in many modern cities.

Dr. Jameel highlights the old legal principle: “Whoever revives a dead land, it is his.” Here, labor becomes the true way a person earns the right to own property, not just through money or government support. In the past, people gained ownership by doing real work like building fences, digging wells, or farming. This was direct and productive. Today, this has changed to borrowing from family, waiting for housing, or speculating, so the connection between people and land is now temporary and based on benefit, not hard work and creation.

Akbar believes that real action is shown by a person’s ability to change their surroundings. When someone opens a window, adds a room, or cleans a shared yard with neighbors, they are working. Modern planning has replaced this kind of work with bureaucracy. Instead of using their energy to build and improve, people now spend it on getting permits and dealing with paperwork, which Akbar sees as unproductive and wasteful.

In his book “Cutting the Truth,” Dr. Jameel goes further in his criticism of how labor is seen in modern states, especially welfare or rentier states. He argues that much government work has become fake work. He points out that government offices are filled with employees, like supervisors and planners, whose main job is to stop people from working or using their property. He believes this wastes national resources and blocks real production.

Dr. Jameel says that society becomes productive when people remove barriers and too many rules, allowing them to work and run small businesses freely and responsibly. He suggests using a “No harm, no foul” rule instead of a system where everything is banned unless you have a permit.

Dr. Akbar calls for responsible freedom. He believes people should be free to manage their surroundings, land, and businesses, as long as they do not harm others. When strict laws stop people from doing this, they stop being producers and become consumers who rely on the state to act for them.

Dr. Jameel thinks that modern planning systems, which come from the West, have taken away people’s ability to shape their own environments. In the past, residents helped decide how their buildings looked, often working with neighbors, so they were active in creating their cities. Now, people mostly buy ready-made homes like villas and apartments, designed by the state or developers, with strict rules about things like building heights and distances. This change has led to people feeling disconnected and less involved.

One of Dr. Jameel’s key ideas is that the more control people have, the more responsibility they take. When the state or city takes away residents’ control over public spaces like streets and parks, it also takes away their sense of responsibility. People stop caring about keeping these areas clean or maintained because they see them as the state’s job. This means the state has to spend more on maintenance and security, while in the past, residents handled these tasks themselves at little cost.

Dr. Jameel connects the loss of personal responsibility to the rise of consumerism. When central authorities control everything, people start to compete over things like fancy homes and cars instead of working to improve their communities. Cities then become collections of isolated consumers who depend on air conditioning and cars, rather than using natural or community-based solutions.

Dr. Jameel points out that urban problems are not just about economics, but also about human rights and regulations. He says we cannot improve productivity, use resources wisely, or even keep cities running unless people regain control over their local environments. This way, people can once again become caretakers of the land, not just consumers.

Some people think Dr. Jameel’s ideas are unrealistic or too idealistic, and others may see them as fitting only a certain traditional or scientific view. However, their real value lies in their inspiration from Islamic culture and in offering smart, thought-provoking examples. These ideas challenge the usual ways of thinking, encourage reflection, and might help bring about change, even if only in small ways.

Rethinking Urban Productivity: From Alienation to Authentic Living

مصنف فى :مقالات
  • زيارات : 495 | تعليقات : 0
  • بتاريخ : 30 ديسمبر 2025
Today’s urban planning faces a major challenge: creating cities that boost productivity without succumbing to the alienation that dominates the capitalist model. The solution lies in achieving two things: strengthening local identity and enabling individuals to build urban environments freely where people’s lives thrive.
Our cities have become centers of consumption rather than production, centers of economic activity that extract rather than add value. With the need to transform our resources into productive centers, we do not want to adopt the capitalist model that views labor and productivity as the ultimate goals. Instead, we want cities that help human development and achieve their collective prosperity.
Karl Marx knew how workers became detached from what they produced. The French thinker Henri Lefebvre (1901-1991) later expanded this perspective, explaining that modern life has institutionalized this alienation to include all aspects of life, including work and leisure, which have become synonymous with a system of total control over life. The individual has become accustomed to working under the conditions of his alienation and is therefore consumed by ways that promise him freedom, while all that they offer him is a temporary distraction.  This creates a closed loop of labor and consumption that leaves very little room for authentic human expression.
Alienation is drowning urban life in tight systems, the working week from Sunday to Thursday, and the working day from eight to five, and bureaucratic systems, which determine not only when we work but also how we live. These systems limit opportunities for experience, growth, and authentic interaction with the environment.
Yet, each city has geographical, cultural, and historical characteristics that can create unique lifestyles. Strengthening local identity in the broadest sense brings far more gains than economic gains. It provides a psychological relationship with place and a sense of belonging and transforms the work from a reciprocal relationship to an investment in the shared future.
Whereas concern for identity alone can become a restrictive tradition. Cities must include physical, temporal, and systemic spaces that allow individuals to experiment, learn, and grow. This means dismantling the rigid frameworks that have come to govern urban life.
Some cities have taken the lead in this field, turning to flexible models of weeks and working days. It recognized that being present does not necessarily mean being productive and provided options for individuals to be free from geographical and temporal constraints. These are not just reforms in labor laws, but a rethinking of how time controls urban life.
The goal is not just to create more jobs, but to create opportunities that enhance potential, connect minds, and contribute to overall well-being. This requires easing bureaucratic barriers to creativity and designing an urban environment that encourages creative collaboration and exchange, supporting diverse economic models that go beyond conventional business frameworks. These include cooperatives, charities, Non-Profit institutions, and other models that distribute power fairly.
Today’s cities need to compete to attract talent, entice investment, and influencers. Such competition could lead to destruction or an inspiring shift in the organization of public life. The difference lies in what we aspire to. If we compete on traditional criteria such as GDP, employment rate, and property value, we will create an alienating system. But if we compete for quality of life, meaningful jobs, and human development, we will create incentives for authentic progress. Cities that thrive will attract people not only with the promise of wealth but also with opportunities for self-actualization, the freedom to pursue meaningful projects, infrastructure that supports experiences, and communities that make work meaningful.
The combination of identity and freedom provides us with a path to the future. The unique identity provides the foundation for the opportunities of the place. Individual freedom motivates research, exploration, and work without restrictions. We stand at a turning point. Economic transformations and awareness of the limitations of capitalist models provide opportunities for alternative models. The productive cities of the future will be measured not only by their economic output, but also by the richness of life that enables them.

Beyond Consumption: Barcelona’s Lessons for Kuwait’s Urban Future

مصنف فى :مقالات
  • زيارات : 273 | تعليقات : 0
  • بتاريخ : 4 ديسمبر 2025
Beyond Consumption: Barcelona’s Lessons for Kuwait’s Urban Future

In my previous blog post, I discussed the importance of reimagining Kuwait’s new cities as engines of productivity instead of consumption. To understand how this transformation might work, we can look to cities that have turned their unique advantages into tangible outcomes. Barcelona serves as a powerful model, demonstrating the interplay between creativity, cultural identity, and economic success.

Barcelona’s rise as a global cultural hub is the product of strategic planning, historic legacy, and continuous investment in arts, identity, and public space. The foundation was laid in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when the city experienced rapid industrial growth and a cultural flourishing known as the Renaixença, which revived Catalan language, arts, and intellectual life. This period produced iconic Modernist architecture—most notably the works of Antoni Gaudí—which gave Barcelona an instantly recognizable aesthetic and a strong cultural identity.

Following decades of political repression, Barcelona seized the democratic transition of the late 1970s as an opportunity to reposition itself. The 1992 Olympic Games became the turning point. The city used the event not simply as a sports project, but as a comprehensive urban and cultural transformation strategy. It renovated its waterfront, created new public spaces, improved transportation, and invested heavily in cultural facilities. This regeneration made Barcelona a model for city branding.

Parallel to this, the city nurtured creative industries—design, architecture, music, and visual arts—by supporting small studios, festivals, and cultural institutions. Landmarks such as the Picasso Museum, MACBA (Museum of Contemporary Art), and the concert hall complex L’Auditori helped diversify the cultural offer far beyond tourism.

Barcelona also promoted a vibrant street culture. Its plazas, promenades, and civic spaces became stages for everyday cultural exchange, making the city feel culturally alive even without formal events. Festivals like La Mercè, a cultural and religious festival, and Sonar, a festival dedicated to music, creativity and technology, further positioned Barcelona at the intersection of tradition and innovation.

Finally, the city marketed itself globally as a Mediterranean, open, and creative destination. Its narrative emphasized lifestyle, creativity, design, and urban quality—attracting artists, entrepreneurs, and millions of visitors.

Through heritage, urban renewal, cultural investment, and strong branding, Barcelona successfully established itself as one of the world’s leading cultural capitals.

The foundations for Kuwait’s transformation are already in place—manageable size, demographic concentration, plentiful resources, and a visionary population. With these advantages, Kuwait can adapt Barcelona’s proven strategies to cultivate its new cities into vibrant centers where economic productivity and cultural dynamism flourish.

مدن ذات معنى: كيف تلهم كوبنهاغن المستقبل الحضري للكويت

مصنف فى :مقالات
  • زيارات : 274 | تعليقات : 0
  • بتاريخ : 19 نوفمبر 2025
مدن ذات معنى: كيف تلهم كوبنهاغن المستقبل الحضري للكويت

بعد مدونتي السابقة، وفي دعوة لتحويل مدن الكويت الجديدة كمراكز للإنتاجية بدلا من مجرد مساحات استهلاك، فمن الضروري التعلم من المدن التي نجحت في الاستفادة من نقاط قوتها وقدراتها المحلية لتحقيق نماذج إنتاجية فريدة. وهنا تبرز كوبنهاغن كمثال رئيسي، حيث تجسّد المدينة الإبداع وجودة الحياة والازدهار.

يعكس ظهور كوبنهاغن كعاصمة ثقافية قرونا من الاستثمار الاستراتيجي في الفنون والهندسة المعمارية والتنمية الحضرية. ففي القرن الثامن عشر ، وضع الملوك الدنماركيون الأساس من خلال تأسيس مؤسسات ثقافية رئيسية ، بما في ذلك الأكاديمية الملكية الدنماركية للفنون الجميلة (1754) – التي أنشأها الملك فريدريك الخامس لتحفيز تأهيل الفنانين والحرفيين المهرة الديناماركيين- بالإضافة إلى المسرح الملكي والمكتبة الملكية. فقد ساهمت هذه المؤسسات لجعل كوبنهاغن مركزاً فكرياً للمملكة، مما خلق إرثا فنيا لا يزال يحدد شخصية المدينة.

وخلال القرن العشرين ، أصبحت كوبنهاغن معيارا دوليا للتخطيط الحضري الذي يركز على الإنسان ، وقد شكلت أساساً من خلال نهج المهندس المعماري جان جيل Jan Gehl في تصميم المدن للسكان بدلا من المركبات. وقد كان إنشاء شارع Strøget في عام 1962 – من بين أولى شوارع المشاة الرئيسية في العالم – رائدا في وضع معايير البيئات الحضرية الصالحة للعيش على مستوى العالم. حالياً، يستقل أكثر من 60٪ من سكان كوبنهاغن الدراجات الهوائية في الذهاب للعمل يومياً، مما يدل على التكامل الناجح للمدينة في التنقل والعافية والتصميم المدروس.

من جهة أخرى، ترتبط الهوية الثقافية لكوبنهاغن ارتباطا جوهريا بتطلعاتها البيئية. فقد أدى التزام المدينة في عام 2012 بأن تصبح أول عاصمة محايدة للكربون في العالم بحلول عام 2025 إلى وضع خطة المناخ CPH 2025 ، والتي تستهدف تحسينات في استهلاك الطاقة والإنتاج والتنقل وإدارة المدينة. وعلى الرغم من مواجهة تحديات عديدة أعاقت تحقيق الهدف، فقد ألهم هذا الطموح مشاريع مبتكرة تمزج بين الاستدامة والتعبير الثقافي ، مثل CopenHill – وهي منشأة لتحويل النفايات إلى طاقة تتوج بمنحدر تزلج ومسار للمشي لمسافات طويلة – و Superkilen Park ، وهي مساحة عامة في نوريبرو Nørrebro  تحتفل بالتنوع من خلال عناصر التصميم من أكثر من 50 دولة. تعكس هذه المبادرات كيف يتم تضمين المسؤولية البيئية والترابط الاجتماعي في الحمض النووي الثقافي لكوبنهاغن.

تعد المدينة أيضا رائدة في التصميم والهندسة المعمارية ، حيث تؤثر جماليتها البسيطة على جميع أنحاء العالم من خلال معالم مثل تصميمات أثاث Arne Jacobsen والمشاريع من قبل Bjarke Ingels Group. ويضمن التمويل العام إمكانية الوصول الثقافي، من مؤسسات مثل متحف لويزيانا للفن الحديث ومتحف التصميم في الدنمارك إلى الأماكن الشعبية العامة مثل كوبنهاغن المعاصرة.

لا ينبع التميز الثقافي لكوبنهاغن من مؤسساتها فحسب، بل ينبع من مبادئها المتجسدة في المساواة والانفتاح وما يعرف محلياً بالهيج – مبدأ يشير إلى الشعور بالرضا المريح والرفاهية من خلال الاستمتاع بالملذات البسيطة – وكلها تعزز مدينة قائمة على الإبداع والاهتمام بالبيئة والمشاركة المجتمعية.

مثل كوبنهاغن، تمتلك الكويت المكونات الأساسية للتحول الحضري. فالكويت ذات نطاق حضري يمكن التحكم فيه، وتركيز سكاني كثيف نسبياً، وموارد وفيرة، ومواطنين ذوي تفكير ابداعي. وتؤكد أوجه التشابه هذه إلى أن الكويت في وضع جيد لتبني الدروس من نجاح كوبنهاغن وتطوير مدنها الجديدة بشكل استراتيجي كمراكز للإنتاجية الاقتصادية والحيوية الثقافية.