أرشيف الوسم: السعودية

Some may ask, “What is the value of this project?” Why do some people bother to call for its preservation and the prevention of its demolition? Some activists, such as Arch. Dema Ak Ghunaim, Arch. Dalal Al Hashash, Dr. Aseel Al Ragam, Dr. Mohamad AL Jassar, Dr. Hassan Ashkanani and others, led the efforts to overturn the government’s decision. In this article, I will try to enumerate a few points that may play a part in convincing the decision makers and the public opinion to preserve the project and rehabilitate it:

1- Some may see the project as an ugly, unworthy structure. However, the concept of beauty and utility changes over time. What we see as ugly today may be seen as beautiful in the eyes of the future generation. Moreover, what we see as useless the future generation may find ways to utilize it wisely.

2- Al Sawaber represents the spirit of a prominent period of the country and carries part of the history of Kuwait. It is a civil and cultural landmark that carries the marks of the eighties period, which is characterized as the development and growth period.

3- Regardless of the quality of the design and our opinions about the success or failure of the project, the project used to house a large number of families. Many people spent an important period of their lives within its boundaries. As such, this compound carries memories and meanings. The value of spaces derives from the events that occurred in them. Cities in general make up their values from the sum of these memory-charged spaces.

4-We need to note that the project has an architectural value; it is a landmark that was designed by a world-renowned Canadian Architect Arthur Erikson. Despite our variable opinions about the success of the design, it is considered an architectural experiment that sought to react to the local environment of Kuwait and its special social requirements. Thus, it is crucial that this project be saved to allow the specialists to evaluate in the future.

5-Such mega projects expend huge human efforts. As the process of planning, designing, constructing and handing over must have taken prolonged periods, deciding to demolish the project will waste all those valuable times that went into the realization of the project.

6-The world today and more than ever is keen on protecting historic buildings and rehabilitating them rather than demolishing and rebuilding. As such practices play a role in the protection of the environment and saving the waste of resources and materials, advanced nations protect the environment and take decisions that reflect their integrity in honoring their commitment to the environment.

7-Before we demolish Al Sawaber, we should review the economic and financial impact of such an act. We should study whether the rehabilitation of the project could be feasible and more attractive. As far as the investors are concerned, this is the most important factor. Why don’t we evaluate alternatives and test them financially, and invite investors and real estate developers to compete on proposing alternative models in order to take our decisions based on accurate information?

8- From an urban point of view, the project has a potential to become an additional value to Kuwait City. It can become a mixed-use development model that houses living, working and entertainment spaces. It can provide alternative venues for the small business and the creative classes who seek an alternative lifestyle. Kuwait City lacks diversity and is filled with the repetition of the same banal commercial model that adds very little to the overall built environment of Kuwait City.

In conclusion, it is dangerous to swiftly take such crucial decisions. Let us be aware of the over confidence that what we are proposing will be better than what currently exists. Let us study the project thoroughly. We have qualified professionals and smart developers who are able to create opportunities, which we can currently benefit from and for the future generations as well.

Time passes over cities and leaves its impact on people and buildings alike. Time is relative, and its impact varies from one location to another. Similarly, science and technology impact the notion of time and affect the way people live everywhere. Life in the country differs from city life in terms of timing and the need for speed. In traditional societies, seasons govern the way people use space; and for Muslims, the five prayer times determine their daily activities.

With modernization and the changing nature of work, work became a routine; and the clock now rules the daily activities of people. Also, means of transport altered the way people view time. While in the past walking controlled how we perceived time, today the vehicle speed organizes how people communicate.

Additionally, the mobile phone revolutionized communication.  It removed barriers from the public and private spheres. It canceled the notion of space completely. As such, people’s activities could take place anytime, anywhere; and as a result, the physical place lost its value completely.

Even buildings that used to be designed and built to last were designed carefully with attention to minute details that allow pedestrians to enjoy their elegant facades. Today, buildings are designed, built swiftly and expected to last for 40 years only. We no longer justify the need to supplement buildings with details as the fast-moving eyes can only notice their silhouettes.

Places and buildings carry traces of memories, meaning and history. Thus, world cities preserve historical sites and buildings. Cities act beyond that and also preserve modern buildings that carry architectural and historical significance. We can import stones and technology, but we can’t buy history, memory and meaning. Such intangible qualities carry the secrets of specificity, the chests of the past and the keys to the future.

We need to replant the value of place and time through the design of our cities, public spaces and architecture. The built environment determines the quality of the places we live in. When designed carefully, it can create a lively environment that brings us to reality and enriches our daily experiences.

يمرُّ الزمنُ على المدن تاركاً أثره على البشرِ والحجرِ، ولكنَّ الزمنَ نسبيٌّ وتأثيره يتفاوت من مكانٍ إلى آخر، ومن الملاحظ بأنَّ التغييرات العلمية والتقنية تُلقي آثاراً كبيرةً على مفهوم الزمن، كما تؤثر بشكلٍ مباشرٍ على حياةِ النَّاسِ في كلِّ مكانٍ، فالحياةُ في الرِّيف تختلفُ عن حياة المدينةِ من جهة التعارفِ على المواقيت والحاجة لسرعة الحركةِ، ففي المجتمعِ التقليديِّ كانتِ المواسمُ تحدِّد طبيعة استخدام المكان، وكانت مواقيتُ الصلاةِ بالنسبة للمسلمين تُقسِّمُ أنشطة اليوم.

ومعَ الحداثة وتغيُّر أنماطُ العمل، أصبحت طبيعةُ العمل روتينية، وغدتِ الساعةُ هي التي تحدد مواعيدَ الناسِ، وكذلك غيَّرت وسائل النقل من مفهوم الناس للزَّمن، فبعد أنْ كات سرعة المشي تحكم فَهْمَ الناسِ للزمن، أصبحت سرعةُ السيارةِ هي من ينظِّم طبيعة المواعيدِ بين الناس.

كذلك فإنَّ الهاتف النقال أحدث نقلةً كبيرةً في مجال التواصل، فقد عمل على إلغاء الحواجز بين الخاصِّ والعامِّ، بل يمكن القول أنَّه ألغى مفهوم المكان كليًاً، حيث أصبحت أنشطة الناس تتمَّ في أيِّ وقتٍ وأيِّ مكانٍ، وعلى ذلك فَقَدَ المكان الحقيقي قيمته.

حتى المباني العامة التي كانت في الماضي تُصمَّمُ وتُبْنَى لتبقى، إذ كانت تُصمَّم بعنايةٍ فائقةٍ وتفاصيلَ دقيقةٍ تُتِيح للماشي على قدميه أنْ يتمعنها بعنايةٍ، ويستمتعُ بواجهاتها، أمَّا اليوم أصبحت المباني تُصمَّم بسرعةٍ وتُبنى لتعيش أربعين سنة فقط، كما لم يَعُد من الضروري إثراؤها بالتفاصيل؛ وذلك لكون الإنسان المسرع من أمامها أو بعيداً عنها لن يتمكنَ إلا من رؤية شكلها العام.

إنَّ الأماكن والمباني تحمل الذاكرة والمعنى والتاريخ؛ لذلك تحرص المدن على المحافظة على الأماكن التراثية والمباني التاريخية، بل تتعدى ذلك إلى المحافظةِ على المباني الحديثة ذات القيمة المعمارية الفريدة والمميزة.

إننا بإمكاننا استيراد الحجر والتقنية، ولكننا لا يمكننا شراء التاريخ والذكريات والمعاني المتجذرة في الأرض، هذه فقط التي تحمل سر الخصوصية وصناديق الماضي ومفاتيح المستقبل.

لذا فنحن بحاجة لإعادة القيمة لمفهوم الزمان والمكان من خلال العناية بمدننا وأماكننا العامة ومبانينا؛ لأَّنَّها تصنع المكان الذي نحيا فيه، ومتى ما صُمِّمَت بعنايةٍ يمكنها أن تخلق بيئة غنية تعيدنا إلى عالم الواقع وتُثري تجربتا اليومية.

Kuwait City is divided into three primary neighbourhoods: Sharq, Qibla and Mirqab. In the sixties and after the implementation of modern urban planning, Qibla gained prominence as the main commercial hub, especially for offices and retail, while Sharq mostly maintained its residential and low-density use. Sharq is bordered by the old market area to the west, Dasman Palace to the east, and the industrial crafts area to the south. Sharq is characterized by low density traditional Arabic houses, ranging in size from 250 to 500 square meters.

In 2002 — after the end of the Iraq war and tumbling of the old regime — Kuwait’s market was optimistic, and it was ready for a new economic and urban renaissance. And as usual, the real estate market was the most active sector. In turn, Kuwaiti developers began to search for opportunities. However, scarcity and the high cost of land hampered the development of Qibla neighbourhood and brought attention to Sharq.

The Municipal council reacted to this demand and issued decrees to change the use of some sites in Sharq (East Moqwa) to commercial land use with the maintenance of high-density residential FAR’s. Also, developers were allowed to build higher buildings and purchase additional air rights for a certain period of time.

During the last fifteen years, Sharq flourished and housed outstanding projects, such as Al Hamra, Al Raya, Al Awadhi, Mazaya, KIPPCO towers, and others. Currently, the capital tower and the NBK headquarters are other architectural landmarks located in Sharq and are under construction.

However, what we observe today is that Sharq suffers from severe urban problems, which negatively affects the quality of its projects and impedes the success of its business environment; this is due to the lack of urban forecasting and planning as well as the bowing of the planner to the pressures of the market and developers that seek quick gains.

This fast and unstudied transformation led an emergence of various urban problems that can be summarised as follows:

 – Traffic congestion occurred, as roads were not planned to accommodate these major commercial developments.

 – Lack of parking spaces led to chaos in parking and blocked roads and sidewalks, which denigrated the overall scene.

 – Deficiency of land use balance and the improper mix-use — especially the provision of adequate residential units to accommodate a portion of those who work at Kuwait City.

 – The absence of an adequately connected pedestrian network that is safe and encourages walkability.

 – The nonexistence of public open spaces that are well-designed and provides an outdoor breather for residents.

 – Disharmony in use and scale, which negatively impact the urban form and urban fabric.

Sharq is a vibrant part of Kuwait City, and today, it houses a group of outstanding architectural landmarks and is the address of leading companies and locations for small entrepreneurs. In addition, there are three main roads that pass through Shar: Ahmad Al Jaber, Jaber Al Mubarak, and Al Shuhada. Once properly designed, these streets possess the ingredients to be successful avenues and can contribute to achieving the vision of Kuwait City as a vibrant centre. This being said, Sharq must be rethought out carefully because it can be developed to protect its projects and environment and prepare it for the future. However, if left to chance, Sharq will face an urban catastrophe and life for residents will become unbearable.