أرشيف الوسم: crime

Rethinking Who Builds Community: Reflections from the Kuwait New Cities Panel

مصنف فى :مقالات
  • زيارات : 23 | تعليقات : 0
  • بتاريخ : 10 سبتمبر 2026
Rethinking Who Builds Community: Reflections from the Kuwait New Cities Panel

At the Conference of Housing and Urban Development, during the panel on “Kuwait New Cities: Investment, Development and Partnership Opportunities,” The raised a question was: how do we deepen the connection between commercial activity and social amenities?

The starting premise is simple but often overlooked. The government cannot, and should not, remain the sole provider of every amenity and social service in a growing urban landscape. As new cities scale up, the demand for parks, community centers, religious and cultural spaces, and everyday social infrastructure will outpace what any single public authority can deliver alone. Meeting that demand requires a deliberate system that distributes responsibility across multiple actors. Thus, I proposed four components of such a system.

First, real estate developers should operate under clear, enforceable requirements to provide a defined share of social amenities within their projects, rather than treating them as optional add-ons negotiated project by project.

Second, cooperative real estate companies should be actively encouraged to participate. Kuwait already has a strong cultural familiarity with cooperative models in the retail sector; extending that logic to real estate development could unlock community-oriented investment that purely commercial developers are less inclined to pursue.

Third, civil society organizations, non-profits, and volunteer groups deserve a genuine, active role in shaping future cities, not a peripheral or symbolic one. These groups often understand community needs more intimately than either government agencies or private developers, and they should be structurally embedded in the planning and delivery process.

Fourth, and perhaps most significant, I called for a re-introduction of the Islamic waqf system. Waqf has a centuries-long track record of sustaining schools, hospitals, water infrastructure, and public spaces across the Islamic world, funded and managed independently of state budgets. Modernizing this instrument for contemporary urban development could provide a culturally rooted, financially sustainable mechanism for delivering social infrastructure at scale.

Taken together, these four pillars point toward a shared-responsibility model for urban development, one where the private sector, cooperatives, civil society, and revived Islamic institutions each carry part of the load currently placed entirely on the state. As Kuwait moves forward with its new cities agenda, this kind of layered partnership may prove essential to building places that are not just built, but truly lived in.

Jleeb and the soul of the city

مصنف فى :مقالات
  • زيارات : 371 | تعليقات : 0
  • بتاريخ : 20 يوليو 2026
Jleeb and the soul of the city

Municipal decisions shape a city’s soul. Smart cities are built on empathy; they preserve order through regulation and strong communication with communities, offering supportive alternatives and applying subtle, data-driven interventions. Therefore, what is happening in Jleeb al-Shuyoukh these days is of great importance and calls for attention.

Over the past two weeks, a group of government institutions has launched a campaign in Jleeb al-Shuyoukh, a densely populated area known for sheltering low-income workers and for its high number of construction violations and other encroachments. As reported by newspapers, the campaign targeted more than 1,000 buildings, resulting in the evacuation of large numbers of residents and difficult conditions for vulnerable segments of society.

Officials see the deteriorating condition of the area as the result of decades of neglect and unregulated growth, with landlords dividing single-family homes into high-density housing. This has led to negative effects on services and infrastructure and presents risks to security and safety. Thus, the time has come to find quick solutions to this corrupt phenomenon.

Although the official authorities’ diagnosis is correct, an intervention of this magnitude requires more practical planning that examines the problem in depth and from all sides. Many cities around the world have faced similar, perhaps even more frequent, problems and have succeeded in solving them by matching intervention to context.

In Kuwait, we have precise tools to address the subject with professionalism, sensitivity, and humanity. We should have looked at the big picture and considered how the urban area could accommodate low-wage housing in a humane and practical way. Prudent planning favors improvements over demolition and prioritizes preserving the structure and social networks, while taking into account for the requirements of security, safety, and engineering efficiency.

Despite all that we see, the Jleeb area has succeeded in attracting workers, housing them, and providing a central location in the heart of Kuwait, offering affordable housing for the simple worker and access to various areas in the north and south of Kuwait. It also provided residents with a relatively acceptable environment, serving as a social incubator for communities, with restaurants, playgrounds, mosques, markets, shops, and both official and informal services. Therefore, it has the elements that have enabled it to survive and operate for decades.

But when we do not find an alternative to human relocation, it would have been better to discover viable alternatives that take into account the requirements of the state and society and do not neglect the priorities and needs of the worker. Hence, we should seek to develop systems that integrate corporate responsibility for workers’ housing, along with work and residence permits. Develop policies that encourage investment, or spending when investment is not feasible, in affordable housing for workers. In addition, involve the community as a whole in making such decisions. Scientific tools, supported by reliable information, are also needed to monitor ongoing compliance with building regulations and security and safety requirements.

Finally, we call for wisdom and compassion, because urban planning is centered on human beings. The imposition of the law does not imply policies of abstract erasure, and illegal or dense housing does not justify sudden evictions, which expose individuals and sometimes families to harsh conditions. Often, this worker is only a victim of system breakdowns or the pressures of circumstances. The sight of workers scouring the roads and surrounding areas, carrying what they could or sleeping on roofs in the heat of summer, is an indication of a moral failure in a country that has always presented itself as a country of humanity and goodness!

Cities are built on compassion; smart municipalities study the steps, know how to implement soft interventions, provide alternatives, and listen to residents, while also developing and enforcing laws and regulations through transparent procedures and accountable measures. We must realize that abiding by the law is rooted in trust, while fear leads to exporting problems or creating new ones.

From Consumer to Constructor: Jameel Akbar’s View of Productive Cities

مصنف فى :مقالات
  • زيارات : 689 | تعليقات : 0
  • بتاريخ : 13 يناير 2026
From Consumer to Constructor: Jameel Akbar’s View of Productive Cities

“Utopia is on the horizon. When I draw nearer by two steps, it retreats two steps. If I proceed ten steps forward, it swiftly slips ten steps ahead. No matter how far I go, I can never reach it. What, then, is the purpose of utopia? It is to cause us to advance.”

              – Eduardo Galeano

—————————————————————————————————————————

Sometimes, turning to radical ideas can be helpful. These ideas challenge what is familiar, encourage new ways of thinking, and offer solutions we might not have considered. Even if they seem impractical, bold ideas can still make a positive difference.

To complete the topic of productive cities, I thought it necessary to present the ideas of the urban thinker Dr. Jamil Akbar, who has made significant contributions to urbanism and seeks to offer a new vision derived from Islamic culture that challenges the prevailing situation. It deals beyond the urban form to the methods of politics and the general administration of the state and the people. Dr. Jamil Abdulqader Akbar is one of those who put forward big ideas, and he works honestly and diligently to spread and defend them. He was a professor of architecture and planning at King Faisal University and the author of the book “Architecture of the Earth in Islam” and the great book “Cutting the Truth”.

Dr. Jameel Akbar sees productivity and work as more than just employment and earning a salary. He connects them closely to property, freedom, and urban development. In his view, work is the only valid way to gain rights, and it is the main force behind the urban energy that is missing in many modern cities.

Dr. Jameel highlights the old legal principle: “Whoever revives a dead land, it is his.” Here, labor becomes the true way a person earns the right to own property, not just through money or government support. In the past, people gained ownership by doing real work like building fences, digging wells, or farming. This was direct and productive. Today, this has changed to borrowing from family, waiting for housing, or speculating, so the connection between people and land is now temporary and based on benefit, not hard work and creation.

Akbar believes that real action is shown by a person’s ability to change their surroundings. When someone opens a window, adds a room, or cleans a shared yard with neighbors, they are working. Modern planning has replaced this kind of work with bureaucracy. Instead of using their energy to build and improve, people now spend it on getting permits and dealing with paperwork, which Akbar sees as unproductive and wasteful.

In his book “Cutting the Truth,” Dr. Jameel goes further in his criticism of how labor is seen in modern states, especially welfare or rentier states. He argues that much government work has become fake work. He points out that government offices are filled with employees, like supervisors and planners, whose main job is to stop people from working or using their property. He believes this wastes national resources and blocks real production.

Dr. Jameel says that society becomes productive when people remove barriers and too many rules, allowing them to work and run small businesses freely and responsibly. He suggests using a “No harm, no foul” rule instead of a system where everything is banned unless you have a permit.

Dr. Akbar calls for responsible freedom. He believes people should be free to manage their surroundings, land, and businesses, as long as they do not harm others. When strict laws stop people from doing this, they stop being producers and become consumers who rely on the state to act for them.

Dr. Jameel thinks that modern planning systems, which come from the West, have taken away people’s ability to shape their own environments. In the past, residents helped decide how their buildings looked, often working with neighbors, so they were active in creating their cities. Now, people mostly buy ready-made homes like villas and apartments, designed by the state or developers, with strict rules about things like building heights and distances. This change has led to people feeling disconnected and less involved.

One of Dr. Jameel’s key ideas is that the more control people have, the more responsibility they take. When the state or city takes away residents’ control over public spaces like streets and parks, it also takes away their sense of responsibility. People stop caring about keeping these areas clean or maintained because they see them as the state’s job. This means the state has to spend more on maintenance and security, while in the past, residents handled these tasks themselves at little cost.

Dr. Jameel connects the loss of personal responsibility to the rise of consumerism. When central authorities control everything, people start to compete over things like fancy homes and cars instead of working to improve their communities. Cities then become collections of isolated consumers who depend on air conditioning and cars, rather than using natural or community-based solutions.

Dr. Jameel points out that urban problems are not just about economics, but also about human rights and regulations. He says we cannot improve productivity, use resources wisely, or even keep cities running unless people regain control over their local environments. This way, people can once again become caretakers of the land, not just consumers.

Some people think Dr. Jameel’s ideas are unrealistic or too idealistic, and others may see them as fitting only a certain traditional or scientific view. However, their real value lies in their inspiration from Islamic culture and in offering smart, thought-provoking examples. These ideas challenge the usual ways of thinking, encourage reflection, and might help bring about change, even if only in small ways.

Rethinking Urban Productivity: From Alienation to Authentic Living

مصنف فى :مقالات
  • زيارات : 544 | تعليقات : 0
  • بتاريخ : 30 ديسمبر 2025
Today’s urban planning faces a major challenge: creating cities that boost productivity without succumbing to the alienation that dominates the capitalist model. The solution lies in achieving two things: strengthening local identity and enabling individuals to build urban environments freely where people’s lives thrive.
Our cities have become centers of consumption rather than production, centers of economic activity that extract rather than add value. With the need to transform our resources into productive centers, we do not want to adopt the capitalist model that views labor and productivity as the ultimate goals. Instead, we want cities that help human development and achieve their collective prosperity.
Karl Marx knew how workers became detached from what they produced. The French thinker Henri Lefebvre (1901-1991) later expanded this perspective, explaining that modern life has institutionalized this alienation to include all aspects of life, including work and leisure, which have become synonymous with a system of total control over life. The individual has become accustomed to working under the conditions of his alienation and is therefore consumed by ways that promise him freedom, while all that they offer him is a temporary distraction.  This creates a closed loop of labor and consumption that leaves very little room for authentic human expression.
Alienation is drowning urban life in tight systems, the working week from Sunday to Thursday, and the working day from eight to five, and bureaucratic systems, which determine not only when we work but also how we live. These systems limit opportunities for experience, growth, and authentic interaction with the environment.
Yet, each city has geographical, cultural, and historical characteristics that can create unique lifestyles. Strengthening local identity in the broadest sense brings far more gains than economic gains. It provides a psychological relationship with place and a sense of belonging and transforms the work from a reciprocal relationship to an investment in the shared future.
Whereas concern for identity alone can become a restrictive tradition. Cities must include physical, temporal, and systemic spaces that allow individuals to experiment, learn, and grow. This means dismantling the rigid frameworks that have come to govern urban life.
Some cities have taken the lead in this field, turning to flexible models of weeks and working days. It recognized that being present does not necessarily mean being productive and provided options for individuals to be free from geographical and temporal constraints. These are not just reforms in labor laws, but a rethinking of how time controls urban life.
The goal is not just to create more jobs, but to create opportunities that enhance potential, connect minds, and contribute to overall well-being. This requires easing bureaucratic barriers to creativity and designing an urban environment that encourages creative collaboration and exchange, supporting diverse economic models that go beyond conventional business frameworks. These include cooperatives, charities, Non-Profit institutions, and other models that distribute power fairly.
Today’s cities need to compete to attract talent, entice investment, and influencers. Such competition could lead to destruction or an inspiring shift in the organization of public life. The difference lies in what we aspire to. If we compete on traditional criteria such as GDP, employment rate, and property value, we will create an alienating system. But if we compete for quality of life, meaningful jobs, and human development, we will create incentives for authentic progress. Cities that thrive will attract people not only with the promise of wealth but also with opportunities for self-actualization, the freedom to pursue meaningful projects, infrastructure that supports experiences, and communities that make work meaningful.
The combination of identity and freedom provides us with a path to the future. The unique identity provides the foundation for the opportunities of the place. Individual freedom motivates research, exploration, and work without restrictions. We stand at a turning point. Economic transformations and awareness of the limitations of capitalist models provide opportunities for alternative models. The productive cities of the future will be measured not only by their economic output, but also by the richness of life that enables them.